Summary: This article examines the emerging role of quantum computing in medical imaging, covering how quantum technologies can accelerate image reconstruction, enhance artificial intelligence (AI) analysis, and enable multi-modal data integration. It explores the technical foundations of quantum computing, current proof-of-concept studies, quantum machine learning (QML) applications, and the barriers to clinical adoption. The discussion includes short-, medium-, and long-term projections for adoption, along with a glossary of technical terms and a Harvard-style reference list.
Keywords: Quantum computing in medical imaging, Quantum machine learning, MRI reconstruction algorithms, PET image processing, Quantum algorithms in healthcare, Medical image analysis innovation
The Next Frontier in Medical Imaging
Medical imaging is central to modern diagnostics and treatment planning, providing clinicians with detailed insight into the structure and function of tissues and organs. Techniques such as magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), computed tomography (CT), positron emission tomography (PET), ultrasound, and hybrid systems like PET/MRI generate vast amounts of high-resolution data. This data must be reconstructed, processed, and analysed efficiently to inform clinical decision-making.
Historically, advances in medical imaging have been tightly coupled with developments in computational technology. The early days of digital imaging in the 1970s saw filtered back-projection in CT scans enabled by mainframe computers. The adoption of parallel computing in the 1990s and GPU acceleration in the 2000s dramatically improved reconstruction times and enabled more sophisticated algorithms. However, the plateauing of Moore’s Law and the increasing complexity of imaging techniques are creating bottlenecks in conventional computing workflows.
The integration of artificial intelligence (AI) has added another layer of computational demand. AI-driven methods for automated segmentation, tumour detection, lesion classification, radiomics, and predictive modelling require large-scale machine learning architectures, often processing multi-dimensional datasets. Training such models can require petaflop-scale computing resources.
Quantum computing offers a fundamentally different computational paradigm. By exploiting the properties of qubits—superposition and entanglement—quantum processors can, in principle, perform certain operations much faster than their classical counterparts. While today’s devices are in the noisy intermediate-scale quantum (NISQ) era, early research shows potential for accelerating image reconstruction, optimisation tasks, and machine learning in medical imaging.
Computational Challenges in Modern Medical Imaging
Modern medical imaging workflows can be divided into three computational stages: acquisition and reconstruction, post-processing and AI-based analysis, and interpretation and integration with other data.
MRI relies on the transformation of k-space data into spatial images. Advanced techniques like compressed sensing and parallel imaging reduce scan times but require iterative reconstruction methods that involve solving large-scale optimisation problems. A high-resolution 3D MRI scan can produce data exceeding 1 GB, with reconstruction times of several minutes to hours depending on algorithm complexity.
CT reconstruction increasingly uses iterative methods instead of traditional filtered back-projection to reduce radiation doses. These involve solving massive, sparse systems with millions of variables. High-end CT scanners may generate datasets with over 2,000 projections, each containing millions of detector readings.
PET is computationally demanding due to the need to reconstruct images from the coincidence detection of gamma photons. Time-of-flight PET improves resolution but increases processing requirements. Algorithms like maximum-likelihood expectation-maximisation (MLEM) and ordered subsets expectation-maximisation (OSEM) can take hours for full datasets without acceleration.
Hybrid modalities such as PET/MRI and SPECT/CT require simultaneous reconstruction pipelines, compounding computational loads. Ultrasound elastography and photoacoustic imaging also present complex wave-based datasets needing advanced reconstruction.
In multi-modal integration, imaging is increasingly combined with genomic, proteomic, and electronic health record data for precision medicine. This requires real-time fusion of heterogeneous datasets, which classical computing often struggles to achieve efficiently.
Quantum Computing Foundations Relevant to Medical Imaging
Qubits differ from classical bits by existing in a superposition of states, enabling parallelism in computation. Entanglement allows qubits to share correlations that are non-classical, and quantum gates manipulate these states to perform operations.
Physical qubit implementations include superconducting qubits, as developed by IBM and Google, which operate at cryogenic temperatures and enable fast gate speeds; trapped-ion qubits, such as those used by IonQ and Quantinuum, which have excellent coherence times but slower operations; photonic qubits, as explored by PsiQuantum, which operate at room temperature and are well-suited to optical networking; neutral atom qubits, which are scalable via optical tweezers; and topological qubits, which offer theoretical robustness to certain errors.
There are two main computational models relevant to medical imaging. Gate-based quantum computing supports algorithms such as the Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT), Grover’s search, Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL), and Quantum Phase Estimation. These can accelerate key steps in reconstruction and analysis. Quantum annealing, as used by D-Wave, is designed for solving optimisation problems and could be applied to image registration or radiotherapy planning.
The QFT can efficiently perform the Fourier transforms central to MRI and CT reconstruction. The HHL algorithm can solve linear systems of equations, which underlie many iterative reconstruction techniques. Grover’s search could speed up image database queries. The Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) can improve classification tasks in radiomics. Variational quantum algorithms such as the Variational Quantum Eigensolver (VQE) and Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) could be applied to parameter optimisation and combinatorial mapping problems in PET. Quantum principal component analysis could accelerate dimensionality reduction in radiomics, and amplitude estimation could improve probability-based segmentation.
Current Research and Proof-of-Concept Studies
Quantum-enhanced MRI reconstruction has been tested in hybrid workflows, such as a 2023 IBM-University of Tokyo collaboration that partially applied the QFT on a 27-qubit superconducting processor to low-resolution k-space data before classical reconstruction. This demonstrated a measurable speed advantage over purely classical processing for small datasets.
In PET, quantum annealing has been explored for mapping time-of-flight coincidence events. A 2022 study showed that for small event sets, quantum annealing reached optimal mappings faster than classical simulated annealing.
Quantum machine learning has been applied to brain tumour classification. A 2024 a study embedded MRI radiomics features from the BraTS dataset into a quantum kernel space using QSVM, achieving slightly higher accuracy in detecting subtle glioma boundaries than classical SVMs.
Other emerging applications include quantum amplitude encoding for MRI image compression, simulated quantum noise suppression to enhance OCT depth resolution, and variational quantum optimisation for radiotherapy beam configuration.
Quantum Machine Learning in Imaging Analysis
QML integrates quantum computing algorithms with classical AI to process high-dimensional medical imaging data more effectively.
Quantum kernel methods can map radiomics features into exponentially larger Hilbert spaces, revealing complex relationships that may improve diagnostic classification. This is particularly useful for distinguishing between benign and malignant findings in imaging datasets where features have non-linear relationships.
Quantum neural networks (QNNs) combine parameterised quantum circuits with classical neural architectures, using quantum layers as feature extractors. This hybrid approach has been tested in histopathology image classification, maintaining accuracy while reducing the number of trainable parameters.
Hybrid deep learning architectures can embed quantum layers into convolutional neural networks, enhancing feature representation. Early tests in mammography suggest improvements in detecting rare cancer subtypes.
Quantum methods may also enable more efficient integration of multi-modal imaging and genomic data, using entanglement to represent cross-modal correlations.
Challenges and Barriers to Adoption
Hardware limitations remain significant. Current devices have limited qubit counts, short coherence times, and gate error rates that limit scalability. Large-scale medical imaging applications will require advances in qubit fidelity and stability.
Quantum error correction is necessary for fault-tolerant computing but requires many physical qubits to create a single logical qubit, increasing hardware demands exponentially.
The software ecosystem for quantum medical imaging is immature, with few domain-specific tools. Most current work adapts general-purpose quantum machine learning libraries.
Data security and privacy must be addressed, especially when using cloud-based quantum resources. Medical imaging data is subject to GDPR and HIPAA regulations.
There is also a skills gap, with a shortage of professionals trained in both quantum computing and medical imaging. Regulatory validation by bodies such as the MHRA and FDA will be essential before clinical deployment.
Future Directions and Potential Impact
In the short term, over the next five years, hybrid quantum-classical workflows are expected to be used in research environments to accelerate specific tasks such as kernel computation and small-scale optimisation.
In the medium term, five to fifteen years from now, specialised clinical tools may emerge, using quantum acceleration for radiomics feature selection, PET reconstruction, and multi-modal fusion in oncology.
In the long term, beyond fifteen years, fully quantum-native pipelines may integrate acquisition, reconstruction, analysis, and multi-modal integration in real time, potentially supported by quantum networks enabling distributed quantum computing for healthcare.
Conclusion
Quantum computing has the potential to transform medical imaging by addressing computational challenges in reconstruction, optimisation, and analysis. Although clinical applications remain years away, proof-of-concept studies indicate real possibilities for improvement in efficiency and diagnostic accuracy. Continued interdisciplinary research and collaboration will be vital in translating these capabilities into healthcare practice.
Glossary of Terms
Amplitude Estimation – A quantum algorithm for estimating probabilities, used in tasks like uncertainty quantification in imaging.
Compressed Sensing – A technique for reconstructing images from undersampled data, reducing acquisition time.
Coherence Time – The duration over which a qubit maintains its quantum state without significant error.
Computed Tomography (CT) – Imaging modality using X-ray projections and computational reconstruction.
Electronic Health Record (EHR) – A digital record of a patient’s medical history and clinical data.
Entanglement – A quantum property where qubits share correlations beyond classical limits.
Fault Tolerance – The ability of a computer to operate correctly despite component failures or errors.
Gate Fidelity – A measure of how accurately a quantum gate performs the intended operation.
General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) – EU/UK regulation governing data privacy and protection.
Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) – A processor designed for parallel tasks, widely used in imaging reconstruction and AI.
Harrow–Hassidim–Lloyd (HHL) Algorithm – A quantum algorithm for solving systems of linear equations.
Hilbert Space – The high-dimensional mathematical space used in quantum mechanics and quantum computing.
Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) – An Imaging modality using magnetic fields and radio waves to create detailed images.
Maximum-Likelihood Expectation-Maximisation (MLEM) – An iterative reconstruction algorithm for PET.
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) – The current generation of quantum devices with limited qubits and non-negligible error rates.
Optical Coherence Tomography (OCT) – An Imaging technique using light waves to capture micrometre-resolution images of tissue.
Parameterised Quantum Circuit (PQC) – A quantum circuit whose gate parameters can be optimised for a given task.
Positron Emission Tomography (PET) – Imaging modality detecting gamma photons from injected radiotracers.
Quantum Approximate Optimisation Algorithm (QAOA) – Quantum algorithm for solving combinatorial optimisation problems.
Quantum Fourier Transform (QFT) – A quantum analogue of the discrete Fourier transform, central to some reconstruction algorithms.
Quantum Neural Network (QNN) – A hybrid model combining quantum circuits and neural network architectures.
Quantum Support Vector Machine (QSVM) – A quantum-enhanced version of the classical SVM for classification.
Radiomics – Extraction of large numbers of quantitative features from medical images for analysis.
Superposition – The ability of a quantum system to exist in multiple states simultaneously.
Trapped-Ion Qubit – A qubit encoded in the quantum state of a trapped atomic ion.
Disclaimer
The information provided in this article, Application of Quantum Computing in Medical Imaging, is intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute medical advice, clinical guidance, or a guarantee of performance for any technology, system, or method described. The discussion of quantum computing applications, proof-of-concept studies, and future projections is based on current research and theoretical models, many of which remain experimental and unproven in clinical settings.
Readers should be aware that quantum computing technologies are in early stages of development, and their suitability, safety, and effectiveness for medical imaging have not been established through large-scale clinical trials or regulatory approval processes. Any potential clinical use will require rigorous validation, compliance with applicable laws and regulations, and oversight by qualified healthcare and technical professionals.
Neither the author nor the publisher accepts responsibility for any decisions, actions, or outcomes based on the information contained in this article. Readers are encouraged to consult relevant experts before applying any concepts, algorithms, or technologies discussed herein to practical or clinical contexts.
You are here: home »