Research Methods and Reproducibility

Research Methods & Reproducibility is a category dedicated to strengthening the foundations of medical imaging, radiopharmaceutical science, and technology-led healthcare research. Progress in these fields depends not only on innovation but on the reliability, transparency, and repeatability of the methods used to generate evidence. When methods are unclear or results cannot be reproduced, confidence in findings is weakened and translation into clinical practice is delayed or compromised.

This category provides space to examine how research is designed, conducted, analysed, and reported across imaging and therapeutic disciplines. It recognises that many of the most significant challenges in modern research arise before data are collected or long after results are published. Choices around study design, validation strategies, sample size, reference standards, and statistical analysis all shape outcomes, yet they are often treated as secondary considerations rather than central scientific questions.

Research Methods & Reproducibility welcomes articles that critically explore these issues in a practical and accessible way. Topics may include standardisation of imaging protocols, validation of artificial intelligence tools, reproducibility of radiopharmaceutical synthesis, variability between scanners or sites, and the impact of software updates on longitudinal studies. By addressing such factors openly, the category supports a more realistic understanding of how research behaves in complex, real-world settings.

A core aim of this section is to encourage transparency and reflection. Negative results, partial successes, and unexpected variability are common in imaging and therapy research, but they are rarely shared. When these experiences remain unpublished, other groups risk repeating the same mistakes or misinterpreting the robustness of reported findings. This category provides a credible outlet for discussing what did not work, why it failed, and what was learned in the process.

The category also complements, rather than competes with, formal journal publishing. While journals focus on outcomes and novelty, Research Methods & Reproducibility focuses on process and reliability. It supports researchers, reviewers, and clinicians by highlighting good practice, common pitfalls, and evolving expectations around rigour and reporting. This is particularly important as multi-centre studies, automated analysis, and data sharing become more common.

Importantly, this category is forward-looking. As imaging research becomes more data-intensive and reliant on complex pipelines, ensuring reproducibility becomes more challenging. Articles in this section can explore emerging standards, methodological guidance, and cultural shifts aimed at improving research quality across disciplines.

By foregrounding methods and reproducibility, Open MedScience reinforces its commitment to credible, responsible science. This category encourages a culture where robustness is valued as highly as innovation, supporting research that can be trusted, built upon, and ultimately translated into meaningful improvements in patient care.

home » Research Methods and Reproducibility